Home
 
 
Directory   ·   Current News   ·   Contact Us   ·   FAQ   ·   Calendar
Search:

Friday - November 21, 2008 - 12:53 pm CST


  • Denmark
  • Donnellson
  • Fort Madison
  • Houghton
  • Jackson Township
  • Keokuk
  • Montrose
  • West Point
  •  

    Denmark Public Meeting

    April 12, 2001

     

     

    STRENGTHS

    Ø      No Zoning or comprehensive plan

    Ø      Tourism-promoting

    Ø      People

    Ø      Historic Bridge in Fort Madison

    Ø      Don’t have red tape

    Ø      Work force

     

    WEAKNESSES

    Ø      People pushing things down our throats

    Ø      Can’t make living in county

    Ø      Supervisors-no variety, all Democrats

    Ø      Landfill – cost/debt

    Ø      Losing businesses and industries

    Ø      Declining number of new housing being built

    Ø      Declining population

    Ø      Price – everything is becoming expensive

    Ø      History of mismanagement

    Ø      No public appearance by supervisors

    Ø      More laws and regulations the more abuse there will be

    Ø      Higher taxes on agriculture

    Ø      Fort Madison and Keokuk are missing the boat – the largest swing bridge – tourism

    Ø      Increase in overall taxes

     

    OPPORTUNITIES

    Ø      Help existing businesses – no new industries – support local industries

    Ø      Protect what we have

    Ø      Emphasis on tourism – history here

    Ø      Don’t control people by use – buy the land if you want to control it

    Ø      Combine county seats – combine Lee County with other counties

    Ø      What will be done after the adoption of Plan?

    Ø      Economic development – be aggressive and assertive

     

    TOP PRIORITIES

    Ø      No zoning (26)

    Ø      Better Secondary Roads, maintain roads- no yellow gravel - south lee county (16)

    Ø      Lower taxes (real estate, etc.)  (14)

    Ø      No comprehensive plan (13)

    Ø      Right to vote on issues, how tax monies were spent  (11)

    Ø      Economic Development -Industry – need jobs (11)

    Ø      New supervisors (9)

    Ø      Better paying jobs to live on, keep young people here  (7)

    Ø      Larger representative of people running the county- more than 3 supervisors (7)

    Ø      Less government (7)

    Ø      Unrestrictive land use (6)

    Ø      Bridge across the River needs to be replaced (6)

    Ø      Better management of county funds (6)

    Ø      The county wasn’t trying to increase red tape and bureaucracy (5)

    Ø      Eliminate Keokuk county offices (4)

    Ø      Education – need more books, help, improvement, etc. (4)

    Ø      Free enterprise is left alone (4)

    Ø      Combine counties in Iowa – four counties together (4)

    Ø      Leave it the way it is (3)

    Ø      County supervisor meetings were held in the evening (3)

    Ø      Agricultural land is preserved not paved over (3)

    Ø      Natural forests areas are preserved not used for housing (3)

    Ø      Less zoning regulations (3)

    Ø      City of Fort Madison and Keokuk administrators would cater to new business interest and existing interests (3)

    Ø      Fiscal responsibility was practiced (3)

    Ø      Residential areas are restricted for family dwellings (2)

    Ø      County Zoning (2)

    Ø      School systems worked on discipline (2)

    Ø      No new bridge in Fort Madison (2)

    Ø      Given more freedom to do our own good with our own money within our own communities (2)

    Ø      County supervisors attending public meetings (2)

    Ø      Encourage business development (2)

    Ø      Don’t change county to conform to city living (1)

    Ø      Government leaders knew how to accomplish their goals (1)

    Ø      Clear areas for commercial development designated so companies know offerings.  Should be bought without use of eminent domain. (1)

    Ø      Rail and river transportation was upgraded (1)

    Ø      Complement existing industry using local natural resources (1)

    Ø      More balanced leadership (1)

    Ø      Cut taxes that is killing our businesses  (1)

    Ø      Stop running off our industry (1)

    Ø      Aggressive leadership in economic development (1)

    Ø      Tourism – promote what we have (1)

    Ø      A lot of what you will attempt to do with our taxes will and can be accomplished privately if the private sector will be allowed. (1)

    Ø      No discrimination in the County (1)

    Ø      Highway construction didn’t take so long to finish (1)

    Ø      Government should stay out of private development (1)

    Ø      Help existing industries (1)

     

    PUBLIC COMMENTS

    Ø      Taxpayers had a vote in this county on changes.

    Ø      If we could trust the supervisors

    Ø      Lee county taxpayers could vote on rural county problems with out Fort Madison and Keokuk.  They have their vote for their city and we can’t take part.  We deserve the same consideration and privilege.

    Ø      I am an agriculture landowner and I have rented out the farming operation the tax assessor claims I do not qualify for ag. land tax credit because I am not doing the work.

    Ø      A lot of talk about developing tourism, no advertising of the engineering fete of the previous century-longest and heaviest swing span in the world (17,000 tons on one pier when span is swung open for tow boats).  Where are signs advertising this????  Tourists are in no hurry to cross the river especially when bridge is open.  I know I used to be a toll collector 45 years ago.

    Ø      We need a new Fort Madison school board – they don’t know how to operate the system with the budget.  Too many private expensive agendas.

     

     


    Lee County Iowa | 933 Avenue H | Fort Madison, Iowa 52627 | 319-376-2341 | Information
    Lee County has attempted to insure accurate information is posted to this site. However, Lee County does not warrant nor guarantee the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of information on this site or information referenced or linked by this site.