Home
 
 
Directory   ·   Current News   ·   Contact Us   ·   FAQ   ·   Calendar
Search:

Wednesday - November 19, 2008 - 03:54 pm CST
    Go to this level SERVICES & INFORMATION     Go to this level GRRWA     Go to this level ADMINISTRATION     Go to this level MINUTES


  • Minutes
  • 01-23-02
  • 02-06-02
  • 02-27-02
  • 03-27-02
  • 04-24-02
  • 05-29-02
  • 6-26-02
  • 07-24-02
  • 08-28-02
  • 09-25-02
  • 11-06-02
  • 01-17-03
  • 02-28-03
  • 04-04-03
  • 04-25-03
  • 06-27-03
  • 05-23-03
  • 07-25-03
  • 08-22-03
  • 09-26-03
  • 10-31-03
  • 11-21-03
  • 12-10-03
  • 01-23-04
  • 03-05-04
  • 03-31-04
  • 04-30-04
  • 05-12-04
  • 05-26-04
  • 06-23-04
  • 07-30-04
  • 08-25-04
  • 09-29-04
  • 10-29-04
  • 11-19-04
  • 12-15-04
  •  

    Great River Regional Waste Authority

     

    Regular Commission Meeting

    April 30, 2004 Minutes

     

    A meeting of the Great River Regional Waste Authority Commission was held Wednesday, May 26, 2004, at the Administration Building, 2092 303rd Avenue, Fort Madison, Iowa.

     

    The following Commission Members were present:

    Chairman Marc Lindeen, Henry County

    Vice Chairman, John Emmett, Iowa State Penitentiary; and

    Commissioner Susan Dunek, City of Keokuk;

    Commissioner Steve Ireland, City of Fort Madison; and

                           

    The following were also present at the meeting:  Mr. Tim Yoder, Director; Mr. Tim Beulow Barker Lemar; Mr. Bob Watson; Jeff Tweedy; Carla Smith; Mike Johnson; Travis Rudd; and Gerry Baksys from the media.

     

    I.                    Meeting Called to Order

    Chairman Lindeen called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m.

     

    II.                 Approval of the Agenda

    Chairman Lindeen called for additions, deletions, or corrections to the agenda. Director Yoder added Resolution 04-44. Commissioner Emmett moved to approve the agenda as amended seconded by Commissioner Dunek.  No discussion.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    III.               Approval of March 31, 2004, April 30, 2004 and May 12, 2004 Meeting Minutes

    Motion was made by Commissioner Dunek to approve all of the meeting minutes seconded by Commissioner Ireland. No discussion.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    IV.               Public Comments

    None

     

    V.                Barker Lemar Update

    Mr. Tim Buelow reported to the Commission that the Organics Survey Data is being collected.  Phase I Leachate Header Design is on hold.  They are waiting for a response from IDNR for the request of the vertical C&D waste on the Phase I landfill before proceeding.  The ground wood data process writing should be finalized next week.  The Airspace Survey of the Phase 2 Region 1 will be completed for the June meeting.

     

    VI.              Directors Report

    The Keokuk Transfer Station (KTS) received approximately 1686 tons of municipal solid waste and 20.11 tons of curbside recyclables from the City of Keokuk during the month of April.

    The landfill received approximately 4829 tons of municipal solid waste (including waste transferred from Keokuk) and 692 tons of construction and demolition waste during the month of April. The Bomag was again down for a day this month due to problems with the hydraulic pumps.  Road Machinery was called in and they were able to repair the equipment.  Many of the hydraulic lines are beginning to show wear and are being replaced.

     

    The south entrance to the landfill has been widened.  There is one culvert that needs to be extended, which will be completed with dryer weather.  The pad for the scrap metal pile has been completed and a base rock has been put down.  This area is now large enough to pile the scrap metal and allow for the scrap metal company to set up their equipment for crushing.  Litter is being controlled with the use of the new litter cages and the additional tarp.  The staff and inmate crew are picking litter up daily around the landfill site.

     

    The Compost department received 972 tons of organic material in April.  The material was processed and used in the construction of windrows.  The gear box on the mixer went out.  A new gear box has been ordered at an estimated cost of $5700.  The gear box will then have to be replaces.  Helmuth Repair, where the mixer was purchased, will complete the repair service when the gearbox arrives.  This mixer, in the short life that GRRWA has owned it, is beginning to show extensive wear. A new mixer has been budgeted for next year.  Staff is considering a mixer that is double the capacity which will be needed for the additional organic material that staff is anticipating coming to the compost facility.  Alliant Energy has begun setting utility line poles to supply service to the compost building and sludge storage tank building.  The wet weather has set back the anticipated completion date.

     

    In March, 317 tons of recyclables were taken in.  Approximately 155 ton of recyclables were sold.  The sold material included News Print and Cardboard.  Cardboard and Newsprint were at a selling price of $100 and $95 per ton respectively.  The forklift lost the #2 engine cylinder last week.  Staff is using this machine sparingly.  This piece of equipment is budgeted to be replaced in Fiscal Year 2005.

     

    Staff has prepared a Tarp and/or Secure Load Policy, see Resolution 04-43. This Policy has come from meetings that were facilitated through the Fort Madison Chamber with local residents and business leaders in Fort Madison.  GRRWA Staff is more than helpful to do our part in controlling litter that leads to the GRRWA facilities.  Director has completed research on Flexible Spending Accounts for employees.  TASC or Total Administrative Services Corporation was recommended by Tom Holtkamp and Glen Graf of TD&T Financial Services.  TD&T currently prepares GRRWA payroll and this would be a good fit.  TASC would handle all of the administrative functions of the Flex Spending Accounts,  The Administration Fee is $600 per year.  There is a one time $25 per eligible employee fee.  This company also has a debit card available for the medical reimbursements that other companies do not have.  Staff has been notified by IPERS that a compliance review will be completed on GRRWA 2003 calendar year payroll.  Staff has prepared gross wage reports for the four quarters of 2003 for IPERS.  The Director will be attending an IDNR Kaizen event from June 1 through June 4.  The event will be held in Des Moines at the IDNR office building.  The purpose of the Kaizen event is for MSW Landfill Permitting.  The objective is to streamline and improve the existing landfill permitting process.  The entire permitting process will be examined and changes will be made if necessary.  Mr. Yoder will be representing all large landfills in the State of Iowa.  The Kaizen Team is made up of two landfill representatives, one member from the IDNR Wildlife Bureau, one member from the IDNR Field Offices, and the staff from the IDNR Planning, Permitting and Engineering department. Caterpillar, Inc. was on site in May to take pictures and develop a story that will be run in their quarterly Governmental publication.  Staff has also been asked to speak at their Governmental Days Seminars that are held in Peoria.  This event is a four day event and will be held some time in August.  All four of the candidates that sat for the Landfill Certification Exam have passed in flying colors.  ISU Extension is hosting a Compost Workshop in Ames, June 8-10.  This workshop is recognized by the IDNR to Certify staff members that are responsible for the compost operation be certified.  Three staff members are planning on attending the workshop.  Staff has begun preparing documents for the City of Fort Madison City Manager Bill Kelly.  Staff intends to have the documents prepared and ready for his review by June 10th.

     

    VII.            Earthly Goods Report

    Mr. Watson reported to the Commission that he has received an order of 100,000 bags of dyed wood mulch for next year.

     

    VIII.          Legal Counsel Report

    Mr. Napier had a fair amount to report to the Commission.  He attended the City of Fort Madison City Council Meeting Last week.  By word of a newspaper we were made aware that the City of Fort Madison had on their meeting agenda a Resolution to drop the Waste Management Fee.  Not only was it a surprise to the Administration but the entire Commission was not made aware that there was an attempt by the City of Fort Madison to change the amount of what is collected by the City.  Attending the meeting was contrary to what was thought as to why he attended the meeting.  It was not to press a lawsuit on the City but to prevent a lawsuit.  The Resolution was tabled.  It is important for the Commission to understand that the Waste Management Fee item that is being used by Mr. Bill Kelly in this process was approved by this Agency and was voted on after months after looking at it by a citizen task force.  The 28E Agreement which everyone at the table is a party to, specifically reserves the authority of the Commission to charge the various members and users the waste management fee.  One of the questions that were upheld that was added is Can We Charge Such a Waste Management Fee?  Around the country it is called different things, user fees, benefit fees, waste management fees; bottom line is it can be done.  The Code of Iowa allows this Agency to assess such fees.  It has worked well and is a bitter pill but is a necessary evil.  It has served the Community, residents and businesses well.  It is unfortunate that this has been called back in for question when we are about three and half years away from paying off the debt and Waste Management Fee be reevaluated.  It is unfair that this Commission has not been given the opportunity to discuss an evaluation of the Waste Management Fee and we have a City Manager basically interloping in the affairs of this Commission.  This is a policy consideration and is a consideration that this Commission needs to  address.  He has explained this all to the city council.  It is unfortunate that Mr. Kelly is not in attendance at the meeting this morning.  He has certainly been invited to these meetings.  It is unfortunate that he has never been up here and even more unfortunate that Mr. Kelly has not talked to the Administrator of this organization to gather information to ask questions as to what now has become more of a turf battle.  I think he would like to manage Great River and it appears that he is trying to do this from a distance.  His last letter indicated that he is uncomfortable coming up here and I would assume that is the reason that he is not here today.  It was explained to the city council that even if Mr. Kelly has questions about the records up here, the record keeping and even the expenditures and his opinions of them, does not give the City any authority to tinker with the Waste Management Fee.  It was further solidified in the agreement with the City through the Sewer Extension Agreement which was a project that benefited Great River that gave the right away and even conditions that provided the City $200,000 plus from Great River for the sewer extension in exchange for the extension and right of way the agreement made was for the City of Fort Madison to continue to collect the Waste Management Fee and pay us on a monthly basis.  The City was allowed to adjust their payment for the amount that was collected off of their water bills.  They are contractually bound to bill those amounts and contractually bound to collect and pay those amounts.  That was the reason that he attended the city meeting and he had to refresh City Attorney Rodger Johnson memory on the agreement.  The City did agree to table the Ordinance.  You were all aware that Bill Kelly has issued his laundry list of requested documents.  He did offer to the City Council under  the opens records statute that we are only obligated to make documents available and if they want copies that they can obtain the copies.  He offered that to the City Council because of the enormous amount of documents and staff time that is being involved in the request and thought it would be much cheaper for the city’s budget and more cost effective for our agency as well.  Evidently the City Council felt that it was a worthwhile expenditure.  I received a letter from Rodger Johnson that no they wanted the copies of the documents.  Tim did not get his letter until Monday as I received a copy of the letter late in the workday Friday.  The letter said that they wanted all of the copies by today but that is not practicable or realistic.  They requested that they are to be delivered to the City Hall.  It would be nice that Mr. Kelly make the trip at least once for the documents so that he knows the way here and in the future if he has questions he can find his way here to ask them.  There is a letter that I just saw this morning asking for additional information on top of what has already been asked and I see that Mr. Kelly has added all of the media to his copy list he is making it clear that he intends to make all of these discussions in the newspaper based on allegations and accusations and not on information of the facts as most people would start out.  But there has been some articles regarding the auditor’s report and Kim Hunsaker who has done the audit here and all saw her audit report and expressed her opinions in the Burlington Hawkeye that everything that has occurred up here is basically as can be expected.  Her job is to find irregularities and did not express any alarm and she said that most of the irregularities are fixed and there is no real problem here.  You did see in her audit report how extensive it was and the Commission should keeping mind that the Auditor’s report is based on a two to three week examination on sight here at Great River.  This was not a cursory review and was simply not done by someone sitting in there office.  The report is what she found and was able to come up with a clean bill of health.  I am confident that after all of the dust settles and Mr. Kelly’s curiosity is satisfied that this Commission’s integrity will be preserved and certainly you as Commissioner’s who have done your job well will be advised to respond to the City Manager’s request and express your level of confidence in what has taken place here in the last several years going back to 1998.  Because Mr. Kelly’s questions may seem noble on the stand point that this agency’s records are open to public review no one objects to or disagrees with but more of the tone that he has taken and manner that he has made his inquiries that has really ruffled feather’s in that he has not asked questions in a fair minded way and has been very accusative.  I don’t know if they teach diplomacy in public administration but he must have missed that class.  In addition not only has this Commission supervised the expenditures and reviewed the financial records over the years, but employees have been drawn into this unfortunately and has affected operations and we have had an independent auditor look at this and has given us an okay and her report has been sent to the State Auditors Office and they have admitted that another audit would be unnecessary.  He would advise from his standpoint as his job with this Commission that staff comply with the request and provide copies of the documents to Mr. Kelly.  He believes that there are a couple of requested documents that are inappropriate under the open records laws and have to get permission from the effected parties before we turn those records over.  What else might be worthwhile to do as you look over this list of requests on items that were spent on the comparative purposes it might be worthwhile to get records from the City of Fort Madison so that we can see if Great River is out of line comparative to other public agencies.  Since Mr. Kelley has set himself up on fiscal responsibility, it may be that his records may give a possibility for this agency to improve upon.  I know that Mr. Kelly has much experience in this area and has certainly exercised his ability where he came from in Bisbee, AZ before coming to Fort Madison which was to his own demise that he involved himself in the same type of tactics down there and hope that it would have a more positive outcome here and for Fort Madison.  If you have any questions for me please feel free to contact me.  He included an Executive Session on the agenda, but was not sure whether it would be needed or not.  It is eminent if the City would chose to arbitrarily lower the Waste Management Fee to the citizens of Fort Madison.  Fort Madison is acting as a collector of those amounts.  He explained to the City Council that the invoice amount will remain the same and if they wanted to shift the burden off to the residents and the residents and the general fund it is there choice.  It must be understood that our expectation is that we receive the full amount that has been billed each month.  If the City does not see it that way and decides to pass the Resolution, they must understand that the only relief that we must seek is judicial injunctive relief and have them determine if they have the authority that they are claiming to have and veto the decisions that have been made by this Commission unilaterally.  I hope that we can avoid having to have a judge answer that and that we can answer the questions and get back to business as usual.

     

     IX.      Action Items

    Resolution GRRWA 04-40:  Resolution Approving Expenditures of the Authority.  Motion by Commissioner Emmett seconded by Commissioner Dunek  to adopt Resolution GRRWA 04-40.  No further discussion.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    Resolution GRRWA 04-41: Resolution Authorizing the Authority Director to Enter into a Hauling Agreement for Waste From the Keokuk Transfer Station for Fiscal Year 2005. Motion by Commissioner Emmett seconded by Commissioner Dunek to adopt Resolution GRRWA 04-41. No further discussion.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    Resolution GRRWA 04-42:  Resolution Approving the Budget for Fiscal Year 2005.  Motion to table Resolution 04-42 until the next Regular Meetings was made by Commissioner Ireland seconded by Commissioner Emmett.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    Resolution GRRWA 04-43:  Resolution Approving Tarp/Secure Load Policy.  Motion by Commissioner Ireland seconded by Commissioner Dunek to adopt Resolution GRRWA 04-43.  Motion was adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    Resolution GRRWA 04-44:  Resolution Approving the Purchase of Equipment.  Motion by Commissioner Emmett seconded by Commissioner Dunek to adopt Resolution GRRWA 04-44.  The purchase of the equipment is subject to the inspection of the equipment by staff.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    X.                      Executive Session:  Possible Pending Litigation

    Forgone

     

    XI.               Other Business

    None

     

    XII.             Board Member Comments

    None

     

    XIII.          Adjourn

    With no further business before the Commission, Commissioner Ireland made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Dunek.  Motion adopted by unanimous voice vote.

     

    Approved as to form and content as adopted at the June 23, 2004 GRRWA Commission meeting.

     

     

     

     


    Lee County Iowa | 933 Avenue H | Fort Madison, Iowa 52627 | 319-376-2341 | Information
    Lee County has attempted to insure accurate information is posted to this site. However, Lee County does not warrant nor guarantee the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of information on this site or information referenced or linked by this site.